AI-generated music is probably among the most convincing of the current world of AI slop. And it's in a lot more places than you may realize, whether its underscoring videos or taking up a spot on your weekly playlist. The thing is — with how streaming companies pay artists, it's not all just fun and games. When this music is released via platforms like Spotify, it directly hurts real artists.
If you haven't heard by now, a probably AI-generated band has racked up more than half a million monthly listeners on Spotify. Dubbed "The Velvet Sundown," everything about the project screams AI. Aside from a series of tweets from the otherwise anonymous band swearing they're real, there's nothing indicating The Velvet Sundown actually exists.
For starters, their images on Spotify have all the signs of AI generation, from nondescript features to an almost slightly cartoonish sheen. The bio, besides reading like it was written by a fourth grader using a thesaurus, checks out as 85 percent AI-generated (at least according to, well, AI).
Neither of those things in and of themselves mean the entire band is fake, of course, but diving into the actual music itself reveals more. Producer and YouTuber Rick Beato made a video where he pulled some of the stems from the songs and identified the types of artifacts that you hear almost exclusively in AI-generated music. Watch the video yourself if you want a more in-depth explanation. Music Ally has also done some great analysis, most recently with a tool reporting that at least 10 of the bands 13 most recent tracks come back as AI-generated with 100 percent confidence, while two more come back with 98 percent confidence, and the last with 76 percent confidence.
And then there's the songs themselves. The Velvet Sundown's most-streamed song as of right now is called "Dust on the Wind," and if you're saying to yourself, "Hey that title sounds strikingly similar to the incredibly popular classic rock hit 'Dust in the Wind,'" well, just wait until you actually hear the song.
Actually, don't go listen to it. Take our word for it that it's a very clear knockoff of that tune that most real artists would be embarrassed to claim. This brand new band also appears astonishingly prolific, too, because they've already got their third full album slated for release on July 14th — which will make three full albums released since June 5th, 2025.
Here's the thing, though. Even if The Velvet Sundown is a fully AI-generated project, whoever created it (and is profiting off it) isn't really breaking Spotify's terms of service. In fact, Spotify is supposedly bloated with AI-generated music, and some say it's ruining the platform.
Spotify technically prohibits AI music that imitates other artists. In other words, creating AI versions of famous people "singing" songs they've never actually recorded. But what if the artist just sounds very similar to another artist but isn't claiming to be them? That's where it gets trickier.
And so far, Spotify hasn't done much to address the concerns. Especially not when you consider how aggressively they've battled bot streams in the past few years. The platform can claim that not that many streams are for AI-generated music on the whole, but there are still millions and millions of streams going to AI music. The Velvet Sundown isn't even the most popular (probably) completely fake artist.
So why exactly does this matter? Because thanks to the way streaming services pay artists, every stream that goes to a fake song ultimately dilutes the revenue pool for real artists.
Yep — all rights holders split money from a pool of revenue. That's currently around 70 percent of the revenue Spotify earns from subscriptions and advertisements etc. So, technically, the more users consume music on Spotify, the less some artists may get paid, assuming Spotify's profits are not also growing.
And that's how an AI artist, which almost certainly does not drive any additional revenue towards Spotify, ultimately dilutes the pool of money going to real artists. Every single stream of The Velvet Sundown takes a little money out of the pockets of every other artist. Sure, it's microscopic in this singular instance, but when you zoom out and see millions of streams going to fake artists, you start to see how it's a much bigger problem. And with no guardrails in place currently, there's nothing really stopping the problem from proliferating.
As we've discussed in the past, the law is incredibly muddy right now around generative AI. Two recent rulings also complicate things even further. Some lawsuits have been dismissed, others are still early in the journey. And in the meantime, Disney and Universal have filed a lawsuit against artificial intelligence company Midjourney, presenting perhaps the biggest legal challenge yet.
But while we have very little idea where this is going legally, one of the key issue brought up so far is whether or not generative AI is leading to a competitive disadvantage for the copyright holders its trained on.
While it may be hard for a fiction author to prove that ChatGPT puts them at a competitive disadvantage, it's much easier for artists to draw a direct line between AI-generated music and money out of their pockets. Not to mention the fact that AI-generated music also competes for ears through things like algorithmically generated playlists and radio stations. You could make a similar case for platforms like TikTok, which pay creators from a pool of revenue.
Judges have yet to rule on whether or not the way companies trained their products — by effectively stealing content — was legal or not. But they have at least in one instance indicated that AI models being trained on copyrighted content is not inherently illegal. That means it's going to require music rights holders to step forward and show how artificial music puts them at a competitive disadvantage and hopefully start putting guardrails on people trying to make a quick buck with AI slop.
Vtubers are growing in popularity as a unique form of content creator. But a lot of people still don’t know what Vtubers are, how they create their content, why many of them choose the style — or how successful you can be doing it. What Are Vtubers?Vtubers are online creators and entertainers who use virtual (often
Read MoreAs the creator economy matures and content creators assert their influence in everyday life, are content creator lawsuits becoming more common? A growing number of creators have found themselves on multiple sides of the legal world for myriad reasons.We’ve Come A Long Way, BabyThe creator economy and content creation in general are in an interesting
Read MoreThere’s a new content creator subscription platform in town, and it’s called Subs.com. Does it have what it takes to dethrone OnlyFans as the most-used subscription platform for individual content creators? Well, one person certainly thinks so — Subs.com founder and CEO Tim Stokely, who founded OnlyFans alongside his brother back in 2016 before exiting in
Read MoreOnlyFans revolutionized paywalled content, particularly for adult stars and social media personalities who wanted to offer mature content safely. But the platform is also known for plenty more than that, from famous chefs to athletes and musicians. Now, the London-based company is reportedly eyeing a sale at an eye-popping $8 billion. Who is looking to buy
Read MoreNever miss a good story!